Security in the War on Terror: Predict, Prevent, Police

The Global War on Terror, which was launched in response to the attacks in America on September 11th, has strengthened approaches to securitisation in its attempt to eliminate terrorism. The figure of the ‘terrorist’ is closely associated with that of the Muslim man who through laws and policies related to counter-terrorism and counter-extremism, such as the Prevent Duty, is constructed as a risk and threat to society. From the Global North to the Global South, racialised communities, especially those racialised as Muslim, experience the War on Terror in their everyday spaces such as in schools and healthcare settings, as the frontlines of the war constantly expand. As we approach the 20-year anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, it is clear that anti-terrorism measures are becoming a permanent feature of society, despite being declared during a state of emergency. In this lesson, we will explore what the emergence of the War on Terror meant for security and, how the US and the West more generally became viewed as ‘exceptional’ forces. Through a focus on the Prevent Duty, we will examine how the War on Terror deploys pre-emptive measures to tackle the threat of terrorism, all of which contributes to rising levels of Islamophobia in society. We consider how such securitising measures have become embedded within the ‘everyday’ and what the consequences are, specifically those racialised as Muslim. Readings CAGE. (2016) The ‘Science’ of Pre-Crime: The Secret ‘Radicalisation’ Study Underpinning Prevent’. Fernandez, S., Faure Walker, R. and Younis, T. (2018) The ‘Where’ of Prevent. Discover Society. Kundnani, A. 2009. Spooked! How not to prevent violent extremism. Available at: https://www.kundnani.org/wp-content/uploads/spooked.pdf Open Society Justice Initiative (2016) Eroding Trust: The UK’s Prevent Counter-extremism Strategy in Health and Education. Medact (2021) Racism, mental health and pre-crime policing: the ethics of Vulnerability Support Hubs. Shafi, A. (2021) The 9/11 complex: The political economy of counter-terrorism. TNI. Sian, K. (2017) “Born radicals? Prevent, positivism and ‘race-thinking’”. Palgrave Communications. TNI (2019)Leaving the War on Terror: A Progressive Alternative to Counter-Terrorism Policy. Resources Ramesh, R. and Halliday, J. (2015) ‘Student accused of being a terrorist for reading book on terrorism’. The Guardian. PositiveNegatives Representing Islam on Campus Questions for Discussion How do pre-emptive security measures increase feelings of insecurity? In what ways has the War on Terror become a permanent feature of everyday life? To what extent has the War on Terror designated certain groups of people as security threats? In what ways can we challenge these assumptions?

Om Podcasten

Sociology is based on a conventional view of the emergence of modernity and the ‘rise of the West’. This privileges mainstream Euro-centred histories. Most sociological accounts of modernity, for example, neglect broader issues of colonialism and empire. They also fail to address the role of forced labour alongside free labour, issues of dispossession and settlement, and the classification of societies and peoples by their ‘stages of development’. The Connected Sociologies Curriculum Project responds to these challenges by providing resources for the reconstruction of the curriculum in the light of new connected histories and their associated connected sociologies. The project is designed to support the transformation of school, college, and university curricula through a critical engagement with the broader histories that have shaped modern societies.