Was There A Great Sugar Conspiracy? (Part Two)

Leave us a voicemail that may be featured on a future episode! Call us at (562)-N4M-POD1 (562-646-7631).  *Right now we are asking for stories about times when a doctor’s care didn’t feel very… caring. Perhaps there was an over-focus on weight/BMI and an under-focus on why you were seeking care? Were you given questionable nutrition, diet, or exercise advice? Were assumptions made about your behaviors based on limited information? Give us a call and share your story! This week wraps up our two-part deep dive into one of nutrition’s most talked-about controversies: the idea that “Big Sugar” reshaped health policy, redirected blame toward dietary fat, and helped create the low-fat food era many of us grew up in. Did the sugar industry really “rewrite the rules of health” and how does this story end?! Join us, two Registered Dietitians, as we finish our time-traveling investigation and reveal the truth behind the controversy.Want to support the show and get bonus episodes? Join our Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/nutritionformortalsWe’ve got MERCH! Check it out HEREDon’t want to miss any episodes in the future? Make sure to subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts!Things we talked about and additional reading: The 2016 Cristin Kearns JAMA article The Mother Jones piece Letter #1Letter #2Letter #3Letter #4Letter #5Letter #6Letter #7Letter #8 The 1967 NEJM Article (part 1)The 1967 NEJM Article (part 2)Financial disclosure history in researchYudkin’s The Slimming Business, 19581977 Dietary Goals Report Science article, 2018  (Big thanks to DM Johns and G Oppenheimer for their writing on this subject) Kearns et al letter to Science and response from authors For feedback or to suggest a show topic email us at [email protected] free to contact our real, live nutrition counseling practice**This podcast is for information purposes only, is not a substitute for individual medical or mental health advice, and does not constitute a patient-provider relationship**